"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
08/02/2017 at 10:47 • Filed to: None
0
10|
"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
08/02/2017 at 10:47 • Filed to: None | 0
| 10 |
No clue why. But my word, !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! hasn’t aged well.
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
fintail
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
08/02/2017 at 11:00 |
|
Always beware when commenting about EVs or hybrids, there’s a rabid cult out there just waiting to pounce, and apparently now they seek old material, too.
Rustholes-Are-Weight-Reduction
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
08/02/2017 at 11:04 |
|
It’s because the article was featured here:
http://jalopnik.com/watch-nine-people-bolt-out-of-a-honda-civic-after-a-wre-1797448378
|
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> fintail
08/02/2017 at 11:06 |
|
Actually they were just recommended notifications.
|
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Rustholes-Are-Weight-Reduction
08/02/2017 at 11:06 |
|
Ah that explains it.
Urambo Tauro
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
08/02/2017 at 12:20 |
|
Makes me wonder... At what point should these conversations be considered “done”? You can’t help that there’s going to be newcomers to the site all the time who want to participate...
I know I’ve seen some posts that had their timestamps reset to bring them back up to the front page (happens a lot on Kotaku, usually with a little note to say when this article was originally published). Clearly the editor/author wants more people to see it, who might have missed it before.
Is there a point at which an article should be totally rewritten as a new post to start new conversations? ...risking the inevitable “but we already talked about this; don’t you remember your own posts?”.
|
fintail
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
08/02/2017 at 12:28 |
|
Even better
|
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Urambo Tauro
08/02/2017 at 12:52 |
|
I share my own posts sometimes when I want more people to see them, but yeah, at a certain point it’s done.
|
Urambo Tauro
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
08/02/2017 at 13:11 |
|
Yeah, but I don’t think I’ve seen you re-share a post that’s more than like a week old. (TBH, I bump some of my posts too, just because I think they get buried too quickly sometimes.)
But -using Kotaku as an example again- some of those posts have been around for three years, or more. Sometimes I don’t even notice, and jump right into the comments. But when I do notice, I find myself avoiding anything more than a month old.
I guess there’s not really anything wrong with participating in old conversations, but the discussion won’t be as lively, that’s for sure. Handing out stars is one thing, but if you have, say, a question that hadn’t been asked yet, then whoever receives the notification is probably going to be the only one to see it.
6691 zapS
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
08/02/2017 at 15:11 |
|
It was at the bottom of a front page article. Didn’t even check date.
|
6691 zapS
> fintail
08/02/2017 at 15:14 |
|
was it me?